|講義概要||This course will cover selected topics in common law and Federal civil procedure in the United States, including: (1) subject matter jurisdiction of the Federal courts; (2) personal jurisdiction in US courts; (3) applicable law in Article III diversity actions; (4) discovery procedures and scope of discovery; (5) class actions; (6) legal framework of product liability; (7) remedies and scope of relief; (8) the impact of civil juries.|
|到達目標||Students who complete the course will have an awareness of a limited subset of issues relevant to activity in the U.S.|
|教科書||In addition to assigned case readings, we will make reference to the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (https://www.cali.org/books/federal-rules-civil-procedure-2015).|
|料||In preparation for the task at the first session (see below), students may wish to refer to the instructions on "How to Brief a Case", available on the website of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice (http://www.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/research/brief.html).|
|成績評価方法||Appraisal will be based on participation and a final examination. Participation will count toward 40%, and the final examination 60% of the final mark.|
|履修条件||There are no academic prerequisites for this course, but students must be prepared to read and analyze court decisions, and of articulating their content in written and spoken English.|
|1||Introduction||Purpose of the course; format of sessions; arrangement of materials; survey of topics to be covered.||Case reading.|
|2||Negligence,causation, scope of duty||1. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railway, 248 N.Y. 339 (1928).
|3||Negligence, warranty, & product liability (1)||1. Donoghue v. Stevenson, 1932 SC 31 (House of Lords).
2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal. 2d 453 (Supreme Court 1944).
|4||Negligence, warranty, & product liability (2)||1. Mcpherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 NY 382 (1916).
2. Rogers v. Unimac Co., 115 Ariz. 115 (1977).
|5||Federal vs state jurisdiction; personal versus subejct matter jurisdiction||1. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 US 310 (Supreme Court 1945).
|6||Diversity jurisdiction, minimum contacts||1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 US 286 (Supreme Court 1980).
2. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty., 480 US 102 (Supreme Court 1987).
|7||Applicable law||1. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US 64 (Supreme Court 1938).
2. Hanna v. Plumer, 380 US 460 (Supreme Court 1965).
|8||Scope of duty and "emotional shock" (1)||1. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co., 379 P. 2d 513 (Supreme Court 1963).
2. Dillon v. Legg, 68 Cal. 2d 728 (Supreme Court 1968).
|9||Scope of duty and "emotional shock" (2)||1. Alcock and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police, 1 AC 310 (1992).
2. White and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police and others, 2 AC 455 (1999).
|10||Class actions (1)||1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, 521 US 591 (Supreme Court 1997).
|11||Class actions (2)||1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit, 547 US 71 (Supreme Court 2006).
2. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Ins., 130 S. Ct. 1431 (Supreme Court 2010).
3. Szabo v. Bridgeport Machines, Inc., 249 F. 3d 672 (Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2001).
|12||Res Judicata||1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Ill. Foundation, 402 US 313 (Supreme Court 1971).
2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 US 322 (Supreme Court 1979).
3. Taylor v. Sturgell, 128 S. Ct. 2161 (Supreme Court 2008).
|13||State and Federal proceedings||1. Younger v. Harris, 401 US 37 (Supreme Court 1971).
|14||Review session||Composite problems crossing the issues and rules reviewed during the course.||Case reading.|
The syllabus page shows a table-oriented view of the course schedule, and the basics of course grading. You can add any other comments, notes, or thoughts you have about the course structure, course policies or anything else.
To add some comments, click the "Edit" link at the top.