Advanced Lecture (Sociology of Law Seminar A)（E)
[Lecture Course Basic Information]
|Course Periods:||Thu 13:00-14:30 (First Class on 10 October 2019)|
|Whether mandatory or not:||None|
|Classroom:||Asian Legal Exchange Lecture room 1|
|Outline of Lecture Course||
This seminar provides students opportunities to learn and discuss the actual functioning of Japanese law and legal system in its social context.
NOTE: This course replaced the course "Basic Readings on Japanese Law and Society." The students who took the course "Basic Readings on Japanese Law and Society" in and before the 2018 Fall term cannnot take this course.
|Course Objectives||Each student picks one topic or more, according to the number of participants, prepares handout that briefly describes what is argued in the material and his or her own opinion, and presents it for class discussion. Students other than the presenter must read materials in advance and actively participate in discussion. Through such efforts, students are expected to obtain basic knowledge and insights on the reality of the Japanese legal system.|
Discussion Topics and Reading Materials
First Meeting: Orientation
I . Reluctant Litigants? Legacy of Kawashima’s Theory on Japanese non-litigiousness
Takeyoshi Kawashima, “Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan,” Arthur von Mehren (ed.), Law in Japan: The Legal Order in a Changing Society, Harvard University Press, 1963, pp.41-72.
John Owen Haley, “The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant,” Journal of Japanese Studies Vol.4, No.2 (1978), pp. 359-390.
II. Socio-legal process of dispute resolution—different strategies in different areas
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Minoru Nakazato. "The Rational Litigant: Settlement Amounts and Verdict Rates in Japan." The Journal of Legal Studies 18, no. 2 (1989): 263-90.
2. Automobile Accidents (2)
Takao Tanase, “The Management of Disputes: Automobile Accident Compensation in Japan,” Law and Society Review, Vol. 24, No. 3 (1990), pp.651-692.
3. Neighborhood Noise Disputes
Mark D. West, “The Resolution of Karaoke Disputes: The Calculus of Institutions and Social Capital,” Journal of Japanese Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2 (1995) pp. 301-337. .
4. Product Liability
Luke Nottage and Yoshitaka Wada, “Japan’s New Product Liability ADR Centers: Bureaucratic, Industry, or Consumer Informalism?” Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht, Nr. 6 (1998), pp. 40-81.
5. Medical Malpractice
Eric Feldman, “Law, Society, and Medical Malpractice Litigation in Japan,” 8 Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2006, pp.257-284..
6.Family Disputes (two articles for one session)
Masayuki Murayama, 2010, “The origins and development of family conciliation in Japan: a political aspect,” Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 143-153.
Ayako Harada, 2019, “Family Reorganization in the Japanese Family Conciliation System: Resolving Divorce Disputes Involving Minor Children,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 33, 75–103.
7. Compensation for Environmental Pollution Victims
Koichiro Fujikura, “Litigation, Administrative Relief, and Political Settlement for Pollution Victim Compensation: Minamata Mercury Poisoning after Fifty Years,” Daniel H. Foote (ed), Law in Japan: A Turning Point, University of Washington Press, 2007, pp.384-403.
III. Japanese Judiciary and Judicial Reform
Frank K. Upham, “Review: Political Lackeys or Faithful Public Servants? Two Views of the Japanese Judiciary,” Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2005, pp. 421-455.
Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan by J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen.
The Spirit of Japanese Law by John Owen Haley and The Japanese Judiciary: Maintaining Integrity, Autonomy, and the Public Trust by John Owen Haley
Annelise Riles and Takashi Uchida. “Reforming Knowledge-A Socio-Legal Critique of the Legal Education Reforms in Japan” Drexel L. Rev. Vol.1, 2009, pp.3-51.
(Additional Reference) Setsuo Miyazawa, “Successes, Failures, and Remaining Issues of the Justice System Reform in Japan: An Introduction to the Symposium Issue,” 36 Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 2013, pp.313-347.
|Assessment||Attendance (10%), presentation (30%), class discussion (20%), after-presentation report (40%).|
|Instructions for Out-of-Class Study||*Read the article before the class|
|Responding to Student Questions||*At classroom or through email or face-to-face upon appointment|
|Other Notes||For the convenience of the course preparetion, students should contact lecturer via email(firstname.lastname@example.org) by October 7.|
|Lecture||Theme||Lecture Course Description||Learning outside the class||Related page|
|1||Each session will focus on a paper provided on the list above. The class workwill be generally divided into three parts. Part 1: presentation, Part 2: small group discussion, Part 3: discussion with all the class members. The presenter(s) will organize the discussion. The lecturer make a final remark at the end of session.|
※Students who wish to enroll as a member should access the URL below.
Log in using the Nagoya University ID and password, and click on "Enroll in Course".
要綱ページには、表形式にまとめたコース スケジュールと、採点についての基本事項が 示されています。コースの体制、コースの方針、その他何に関することでも、コメント、補足、 ご自分の考えなどを自由に追加できます。
コメントを追加するには、右側にある "要綱の記述の編集" リンクをクリックします。